DOI: 10.3390/a19060494 ISSN: 1999-4893

A Geometry-Aware Segmented Deep Reinforcement Learning Method for Speed Control in Airport Surface Taxiing

Jiuxia Guo, Zihao Ren, Yaqian Du, Jingyang Huang, Pengcheng Dan

Aircraft taxiing speed control along predefined airport surface routes is a constrained single-aircraft longitudinal control problem involving heterogeneous route geometry, action smoothness, and terminal velocity feasibility. Existing learning-based taxiing controllers commonly use a unified policy for the whole route, which may be insufficient for handling straight-segment propulsion, curved-segment speed regulation, and action discontinuities near straight–curve transitions. This paper proposes SegCoord-Taxi, a geometry-aware segmented deep reinforcement learning framework for taxiing speed control. The route is decomposed into straight segments, curved segments, and transition boundary zones. A Straight-Segment Policy (SSP) and a Curved-Segment Policy (CSP) generate geometry-dependent base acceleration commands, a Switch Residual Adapter (SRA) provides local residual correction near transition regions, and a Route-Level Feasibility Projection (RFP) maps the coordinated action into an executable acceleration satisfying route-level feasibility constraints. Experiments on departure taxiing routes at Chengdu Tianfu International Airport (ZUTF) included baseline comparison, ablation analysis, projection diagnostics, sensitivity analysis, and a trajectory-level case study. On the evaluated ZUTF case-study routes, SegCoord-Taxi achieves the lowest final velocity on the test set, 0.336±0.017 m/s, compared with 0.732±0.061 m/s for the unified Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) controller and 0.586 m/s for the curvature-aware constrained optimizer. The complete framework also reduces switch action jump from 1.022±0.017 m/s2 to 0.429±0.004 m/s2 in the ablation study. These results indicate improved terminal feasibility and transition-region smoothness in the evaluated single-airport case-study setting under an explicit efficiency–smoothness–feasibility trade-off. Future work will extend the framework to multi-aircraft and multi-airport settings under operational uncertainty.

More from our Archive