A Delphi and Importance–Performance Analysis Framework for Fire Safety Competencies of Architects and Fire Safety Engineering Consultants in the UAE

Fire safety in high-rise buildings represents a critical challenge in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), where intensive urbanization, extreme climatic conditions, and multilayered regulatory frameworks impose unique competency demands on architects and Fire Safety Engineering (FSE) consultants. Despite this, no empirically validated competency framework exists that simultaneously addresses both professional groups and is tailored to the specificities of the UAE context. This study aimed to construct and empirically validate such a framework. A three-phase sequential exploratory mixed-method design was employed. In the first phase, a systematic literature review yielded a preliminary set of 69 competency indicators organized within a Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes (KSA) structure. In the second phase, a three-round Delphi technique with an expert panel of 18 specialists validated the set to 62 final indicators. In the third phase, importance–performance analysis (IPA) was conducted on a sample of 250 professionals actively engaged in fire safety projects across four UAE. IPA identified 16 priority competency gaps, most pronounced in digital transformation (BIM, CFD, AI; gap = 1.23), proactive client advisory competencies (gap = 1.21), and regulatory navigation and Civil Defence coordination (gap = 1.00). A counterintuitive finding emerged whereby architects systematically rated competencies higher than FSE consultants across all dimensions (all p < 0.05). Psychometric validation confirmed excellent instrument reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha > 0.95) and a theoretically consistent three-factor KSA structure explaining 70.06% of variance. The developed framework of 62 empirically validated indicators represents the first competency model of its kind for architects and FSE consultants in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. Its findings provide a direct empirical basis for curriculum reform, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) programmes, and professional licencing standards in the UAE and across the GCC region. The study makes three original contributions: the first empirically validated UAE-specific competency framework for these professional groups; a methodological combination of Delphi, IPA, EFA, Mann–Whitney, and Kruskal–Wallis not previously applied in fire safety competency research; and empirical confirmation that 74% of indicators required original development or adaptation, demonstrating the limitations of generic international competency models in the UAE context.