Madhukar Rajaram Wagh, Kamlesh U. Gohil, Rahul Babubhai Parmar

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ONLAY MESH REPAIR (LICHTENSTEIN'S) AND LAPAROSCOPIC TOTALLY EXTRA PERITONEAL MESH REPAIR IN THE TREATMENT OF INGUINAL HERNIA

  • Community and Home Care
  • Marketing
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Drug Discovery
  • Pharmaceutical Science
  • Pharmacology
  • General Medicine
  • General Medicine
  • General Medicine
  • General Medicine
  • General Medicine
  • General Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • General Environmental Science
  • General Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • General Environmental Science
  • General Medicine
Save to CiteDrive Show PDF

To compare the results of Onlay (Lichtenstein's) and Laparoscopic totally extra peritoneal mesh repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia in terms of Post-operative pain , Analgesic requirements, Nerve entrapment & its sequel , Cord oedema, Orchitis, Scrotal oedema, recurrence in patients who presented to the department of General Surgery in the past two years. There was a signicant difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups. Orchitis and Nerve paresis were virtually absent in the Laparoscopic mesh repair (TEP) group, which were present in a few number of patients in the onlay mesh repair group which is statistically signicant (p<0.05). There was no recurrence at all in both the groups during this limited follow-up period. A longer period of study is therefore needed to identify recurrence within these groups to know the apparent advantage of mesh repairs.

Need a simple solution for managing your BibTeX entries? Explore CiteDrive!

  • Web-based, modern reference management
  • Collaborate and share with fellow researchers
  • Integration with Overleaf
  • Comprehensive BibTeX/BibLaTeX support
  • Save articles and websites directly from your browser
  • Search for new articles from a database of tens of millions of references
Try out CiteDrive

More from our Archive