A cognitive mathematical modeling method for comparing stacked bar graphs in descriptive visual data science
Ronaldo Vigo, Abigail Bartlett
A great deal of research in data science has been devoted to data visualization techniques but not to their effectiveness from a perceptual, and more generally, cognitive standpoint. This is important because the way that human observers perceive and judge the graphic representation of numerical data can ultimately determine its interpretation. As proof of concept, we introduce and test a quantitative method for replacing human judges in the comparative assessment of simple stacked bar graphs (SBGs). As suggested, the method involves the application of Shepard’s similarity assessment model, a well-known cognitive mathematical model which determines similarities between exemplars as a function of their distance in psychological space. In addition, the method involves a simple technique for transforming each SBG into an appropriate representation that makes the application of the model possible and a cognitively meaningful method for scaling the representation. Specifically, the method assumes that humans form a psychological distance baseline (computed as a median or a mean across the SBGs) as the basis for scaling the representation. The effectiveness of the method was tested with an experiment on similarity judgments between SBGs. Results indicate that our method effectively predicts people’s similarity judgments with respect to pairs of SBGs (