A 25-Year Meta-Analysis of LGBTQ+ Cybervictimization and Suicide Ideation and Behavior
Kaitlyn R. Schuler, Evan J. Struemph, Slim M. Barrows, Sophie G. Gornet, Gabriella D. B. Bauer, Nicole Aragon Garcia, Nicholas C. Borgogna, Alia A. JonesAbstract: Objective: Sexual and gender minorities (SGM) are at disproportionately high risk of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) and cybervictimization may contribute to this risk. This is the first meta-analysis on the association between cybervictimization and SITBs in SGM samples. Methods: A systematic search of six databases identified peer-reviewed articles and theses/dissertations (2000–2025) examining the association between cybervictimization and SITBs in SGM samples, or moderation effects between SGM identity and cybervictimization on SITBs. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria. Two random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using correlation as the effect size metric. Study quality, publication bias, and heterogeneity were assessed using PRISMA guidelines. Results: Ten studies yielded a significant and positive, but small, aggregate effect between cybervictimization and SITBs in SGM samples ( r = .23), which remained significant after adjusting for publication bias ( r = .18) and sensitivity analyses. The prediction interval (.005 to .435) indicated effects may vary widely in future studies. The meta-analysis of six studies examining interaction effects produced a near zero effect ( r = −.003). Limitations: The small number of eligible studies, high heterogeneity, and reliance on cross-sectional designs and single-item measures limit causal conclusions and the ability to perform subgroup analyses. Conclusions: Findings highlight substantial limitations in the current evidence base on SGM cybervictimization and SITBs, which stymies suicide prevention and online safety policy efforts.