DOI: 10.11647/obp.0522.05 ISSN:

5. Literature and Cultural Politics

John R.W. Speller

This chapter examines how literature and literary criticism become resources for political intervention in Pierre Bourdieu’s work. It begins by tracing Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski’s analysis in La Production de l’idéologie dominante of how dominant discourse is generated and naturalised through commonplaces, euphemisms, recurrent oppositions, and rhetorical automatisms. It then examines two examples of literary modes of critique used to disrupt such discourse: their pastiche, modelled on Flaubert’s Dictionnaire des idées reçues , which exposes the formulas and assumptions underlying dominant discourse; and Bourdieu’s hermeneutic reading in ‘La Pensée Tietmeyer’, which reveals the interests served and the social consequences obscured by ostensibly neutral economic language. From these examples, the chapter develops a broader conception of Bourdieu’s ‘politics of form’: the capacity of satire, parody, quotation, montage, and narrative not merely to convey political messages, but to alter perception, expose symbolic domination, and reopen the space of possible futures. Finally, the chapter examines Bourdieu’s efforts to give these modes of intervention a collective and organisational basis through Liber, the International Parliament of Writers, and the intellectuel collectif .

More from our Archive