358. CIRCULAR STAPLER METHOD FOR AVOIDING STRICTURE OF CERVICAL ESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS, ‘NON-TENSIONING METHOD’
Osamu Shiraishi, Masuhiro Terada, Masashi Koda, Tomoya Nakanishi, Takaomi Hagi, Yoko Hiraki, Hiroaki Kato, Atsushi Yasda, Masayuki Shinkai, Motohiro Imano, Takushi Yasuda- Gastroenterology
- General Medicine
Abstract
Background
The weakness for the circular stapler technique of esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer is anastomotic stricture. This study was performed to verify the superiority of a new ‘non-tensioning method’ for avoiding stricture of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis by circular stapling compared with the conventional method.
Methods
In 461 patients who underwent McKeown esophagectomy with gastric conduit (GC) reconstruction were reviewed. A GC was pulled up at the cervical site through the retrosternal route. The esophagogastrostomy site of the GC was planned as far caudally as possible on the greater curvature side. In the conventional method, the stapler was fired while pulling the GC to avoid tissue slack. In the new method, the stapler was fired through the natural thickness of the stomach wall. The blind end length was changed from 4 to 2 cm. Anastomotic stricture was compared between the two techniques, and adjustment was performed using propensity score matching.
Results
The conventional group comprised 315 patients, and the non-tensioning group comprised 146 patients. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 22 (7%) and 6 (4%) patients, respectively (P = 0.211) [and in 9 (3%) and 3 (2%) patients, respectively, if leakage at the blind end was excluded]. Anastomotic stricture occurred in 92 (29%) and 7 (5%) patients, respectively (P < 0.001). The propensity score-matching analysis including 134 pairs of patients confirmed a lower stricture rate in the non-tensioning than conventional group (4% vs. 27%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions
The non-tensioning technique, the natural thickness of the stomach wall was fired with the stapler, significantly reduced the incidence of anastomotic stricture compared with the conventional technique.