Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the very elderly (≥80 years old): Insights from the UC San Diego AF Ablation Registry
Omar M. Aldaas, Douglas Darden, Praneet S. Mylavarapu, Amer M. Aldaas, Frederick T. Han, Kurt S. Hoffmayer, David Krummen, Gordon Ho, Farshad Raissi, Gregory K. Feld, Jonathan C. Hsu- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- General Medicine
Abstract
Background
Catheter ablation improves outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. However, its safety and efficacy in the very elderly (≥80 years old) is not well described.
Hypothesis
Ablation of AF in the very elderly is safe and effective.
Methods
We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent catheter ablation enrolled in the University of California, San Diego AF Ablation Registry. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial arrhythmias on or off antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs).
Results
Of 847 patients, 42 (5.0%) were 80 years of age or greater with a median age of 81.5 (80–82.3) and 805 (95.0%) were less than 80 years of age with a median age of 64.4 (57.6–70.2). Among those who were ≥80 years old, 29 were undergoing de novo ablation (69.0%), whereas in the younger cohort, 518 (64.5%) were undergoing de novo ablation (p = .548). There were no statistically significant differences in fluoroscopy (p = .406) or total procedure times (p = .076), AAD use (p = .611), or procedural complications (p = .500) between groups. After multivariable adjustment, there were no statistically significant differences in recurrence of any atrial arrhythmias on or off AAD (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]: 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45–1.23; p = .252), all‐cause hospitalizations (AHR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.46–1.60; p = .626), or all‐cause mortality (AHR: 4.48; 95% CI: 0.59–34.07; p = .147) between the very elderly and the younger cohort.
Conclusion
In this registry analysis, catheter ablation of AF appears similarly effective and safe in patients 80 years or older when compared to a younger cohort.