DOI: 10.31025/2611-4135/2023.18328 ISSN: 2611-4135
EVALUATION OF DUST EMISSION RATE FROM LANDFILL MINING ACTIVITIES
Mohammed Zari, Richard Smith, Rebecca Ferrari - Waste Management and Disposal
- Environmental Chemistry
- Environmental Engineering
Mining operations are one of the most significant sources of particulate emissions in the atmosphere. Landfill mining (LFM) process activities, including excavation, screening, shredding, and equipment handling, have the potential to emit particulate matter into the environment as short-term episodic emissions during operational periods. Previous investigations show that LFM activities can potentially cause human health and environmental impacts through exposure of these emissions. This paper evaluates the dust emission rate of such activities to understand factors responsible for higher emissions rate and determine where any pressure points exist in order to mitigate risk. Nine empirical formulas were adopted from surface mining activities, including point, line, and area sources of activity. Parameters identified in the equations were adjusted to LFM application conditions. From emission results, it is observed that point source activities were the major sources of emission. The study area was divided into multiple phases and one phase cumulative for the maximum/average/minimum point sources emissions over the lifetime of the landfill mining operation calculated in this study are approximately 5.04 tonnes (t) / 3.23 (t) / 1.61 (t), respectively. However, the one phase cumulative for the maximum/average/minimum line sources emissions over the lifetime of the landfill mining operation are approximately 100.8 (kg/m) / 40.32 (kg/m) / 20.16 (kg/m), respectively. Mitigation measures to control high emission rate of LFM related activity, such as utilising tankers or bowsers to spray water around the LFM area, to control airborne emissions, should be considered. The results of this research are expected to inform air dispersion modelling for environmental impact assessment studies of air pollution.
More from our Archive
-
DOI: 10.1002/wer.10951 2023
Alternative treatment of olive mill wastewater by combined sulfate radical‐based advanced electrocoagulation processes Senem Yazici Guvenc, Sinan Tunc
-
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.7572 2023
Rational Optimization of 2D Bi2MoO6 Nanopiece @ 2D g‐C3N4 Nanoflake Composite for Boosting Photocatalytic Performance of HER and ODR Zhentao Wang, Jingjing Wang, Waheed Iqbal, Yuxin Qiao, Shuxin Liu, Chuanguang Qin
-
DOI: 10.2166/washdev.2023.137 2023
The integrity management toolbox in action: a study of 22 urban water service cases Pilar Avello, Umrbek Allakulov, Leonellha Barreto-Dillon, Binayak Das, Janek Hermann-Friede, Lotten Hubendick, Lotte Feuerstein, Alejandro Jiménez Fdez de Palencia
-
DOI: 10.2166/washdev.2023.152 2023
Sanitary conditions of the third largest informal settlement in Brazil Fernando Augusto Braga Castro, André Luís de Sá Salomão, Alena Torres Netto
-
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.7571 2023
Monitoring by Raman spectroscopy of rabies virus‐like particles production since the initial development stages Luis Giovani Oliveira Guardalini, Rafaela Morais Rangel, Jaci Leme, Thaissa Consoni Bernardino, Suellen Regina da Silveira, Aldo Tonso, Soraia Attie Calil Jorge, Eutimio Gustavo Fernández Núñez
-
DOI: 10.1002/eem2.12667 2023
Amphipathic Janus Nanofibers Aerogel for Efficient Solar Steam Generation Rui Wang, Jinshuo Deng, Ping Wu, Qianli Ma, Xiangting Dong, Wensheng Yu, Guixia Liu, Jinxian Wang, Lei Liu
-
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.13109 2023
Environmental factors controlling biochar climate change mitigation potential in British Columbia's agricultural soils David Lefebvre, Jean‐Thomas Cornelis, Jeroen Meersmans, Jack Edgar, Morgan Hamilton, Xiaotao Bi
-
DOI: 10.3390/hydrology10120224 2023
Stream-Aquifer Systems in Semi-Arid Regions: Hydrologic, Legal, and Management Issues Neil S. Grigg, Ryan T. Bailey, Ryan G. Smith
-
DOI: 10.3390/hydrology10120225 2023
Estimating Thermal Impact on Groundwater Systems from Heat Pump Technologies: A Simplified Method for High Flow Rates David Krcmar, Tibor Kovacs, Matej Molnar, Kamila Hodasova, Martin Zatlakovic
-
DOI: 10.1002/tqem.22160 2023
Water quality assessment and spatial‐temporal change: The case of Zipingpu Reservoir in central Sichuan Province, China Kai Su, Qin Wang, Rong Cao, Zhongshan Peng, Yingwei Xi, Guizhi Li