Diagnostic Utility of a Modified Reticulin Algorithm in Pediatric Adrenocortical Neoplasms
Oscar Lopez-Nunez, Calogero Virgone, Irina S. Kletskaya, Luisa Santoro, Stefano Giuliani, Bruce Okoye, Marco Volante, Andrea Ferrari, Gianni Bisogno, Eleonora Duregon, Mauro Papotti, Gianluca De Salvo, Sarangarajan Ranganathan, Rita Alaggio- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Surgery
- Anatomy
Pediatric adrenocortical neoplasms (ACNs) are extremely rare tumors in contrast to their adult counterparts. Distinguishing benign from malignant is challenging based on pure morphologic grounds. Previously, 2 scoring systems were proposed in pediatric ACN, including the Wieneke criteria (WC) and its modified version (modified WC [mWC]). In adults, the reticulin algorithm (RA) has proven inexpensive, reliable, predictive, and reproducible; however, it has been validated only recently in children in a limited number of cases. This study aims to assess the RA utility compared with other scoring systems in a series of 92 pediatric ACNs. All cases were individually scored, and mitotic rate cutoffs were recorded. Reticulin alterations were classified as quantitative and qualitative. Outcome data were available in 59/92. The median age was 5 years (0.1 to 18 y) with an M:F of 0.6. Clinical presentation included virilization (39%), Cushing syndrome (21%), other symptoms (4%), and asymptomatic (36%). The reticulin framework was intact in 27% and altered in 73% of cases, showing qualitative (22%), quantitative (73%), and both (5%) alterations. In patients with favorable outcomes, 59% showed either intact reticulin or qualitative alteration compared with the unfavorable outcome group, where 90% showed quantitative alterations. All scoring systems WC (