Beyond surviving: A scoping review of collaborative care models to inform the future of post-discharge trauma care
Saba Ilkhani, Cameron E. Comrie, Nathaniel Pinkes, Carolyn L. Zier, Shonali G. Gaudino, Mary D. Slavin, Lewis E. Kazis, Colleen M. Ryan, Jeffrey C. Schneider, David H. Livingston, Ali Salim, Geoffrey A. Anderson, Juan P. Herrera-EscobarAbstract
Trauma centers demonstrate an impressive ability to save lives, as reflected by inpatient survival rates of over 95% in the United States. Nevertheless, we fail to allocate sufficient effort and resources to ensure that survivors and their families receive the necessary care and support after leaving the trauma center. The objective of this scoping review is to systematically map the research on collaborative care models (CCM) that have been put forward to improve trauma survivorship. Of 833 articles screened, we included 16 studies evaluating eight collaborative care programs, predominantly in the U.S. The majority of the programs offered care coordination and averaged 9-months in duration. Three-fourths of the programs incorporated a mental health provider within their primary team. Observed outcomes were diverse: some models showed increased engagement (e.g., Center for Trauma Survivorship, trauma quality-of-life follow-up clinic), while others presented mixed mental health outcomes and varied results on pain and healthcare utilization. The findings of this study indicate that collaborative interventions may be effective in mental health screening, PTSD and depression management, effective referrals, and improving patient satisfaction with care. A consensus on core elements and cost-effectiveness of CCMs is necessary to set the standard for comprehensive care in post-trauma recovery.